In the first half of the election day only, CRTA’s observers recorded several cases of physical and verbal violence at and in the vicinity of polling stations, while other violent incidents were reported as well.
A total of 9,9 percent of voters registered in the Voters’ List voted in parliamentary elections by 10:00 (margin of error 0,4). In comparison, voter turnout by 10:00 in the 2016 parliamentary elections was 9,4 percent, and 9,1 percent in the 2020 parliamentary elections.
A total of 26,7 percent of voters voted in parliamentary elections by 13:00 (margin of error 0,7). In comparison, voter turnout by 13:00 in the 2016 parliamentary and 2017 presidential elections was 25,1 percent, and 22,9 percent in the 2020 elections.
Institutions responsible for implementing laws and protecting voter rights did not, through their work, sufficiently contribute to protecting the public interest and achieving a higher degree of standards for free and democratic elections. Those institutions that did react to law breaches during the campaign did not influence a change in behaviour of those electoral actors who abused their institutional advantages in the election campaign.
Citizens from socially vulnerable categories, as well as public sector employees, are daily and continuously pressured to give their support or enforce support among other people for a political party. This is one of the main findings of the CRTA Observation Mission during the first part of the election campaign. Findings also show that, although…
After several months in which political pluralism was almost non-existent due to the dominance of government representatives on television stations with national coverage, CRTA’s data show that during the first three weeks of the campaign there was a change in the coverage and reporting of opposition election actors. This change is marked by growing media…
On behalf of CRTA, I would like to thank you for the opportunity to address the Committee. The election campaign in Serbia started with diversity in the election offer but in less favorable conditions for parties that do not constitute the ruling majority. The course of the campaign, so far, shows the presence of issues which burdened previous Serbian elections, also erasing the line between the state and party: abuse of state resources and office, pressures on voters, vote-buying and other forms of electoral corruption.
CRTA has formed the largest election observation mission so far, that will assess the quality of voting process at presidential, parliamentary and Belgrade elections on April 3. More than three thousand of observers, trained in accordance with the highest international standards, will monitor elections, which is twice more observers than in 2020 elections.
On behalf of CRTA, I would like to thank you for the opportunity to address the Delegation. 2022 Elections will take place in the shadow of the Russian invasion of Ukraine. Serbian authorities’ hesitation to fully align with the EU foreign policy is an outcome of a long-trend Russian political and economic influence and Serbian energy dependency from Russia. The context of war and lack of straightforward policies may intensify tensions in the ongoing election campaign. Pro-regime media are exploiting the war to glorify Russia and create new narratives that the president is heroically resisting pressures in securing Serbian independence. The election campaign in Serbia started with diversity in the election offer but in less favorable conditions for parties that do not constitute the ruling majority.
Our topics
Democratic culture
Because politics is not just for politicians. It is our human and citizen right to participate in the processes of making decisions which influence our lives. A dialogue has no alternative.
Free and fair elections
Because elections are the pillars of democracy. It is every citizen’s right to decide on whom to give his/her vote in free and fair conditions. Our vote is valuable and it can make a difference.
Open institutions
Because institutions serve the citizens. We need strong institutions with integrity which protect the public interest.
Free media
Because media should ask questions and critically analyse the reality. We need the media which protect the public interest and tackle the needs of the citizens.
